DID THE UNITED NATIONS CREATE
THE
United Nations General Assembly Resolution no. 181 of 1947 (commonly known as the Palestine Partition Plan) recommended the creation from all of the lands of Mandatory Palestine west of the Jordan River, representing 22% of original Mandatory Palestine, a Jewish state (comprising slightly less than 11% of the Land), an Arab state (comprising slightly less than 11% of the Land) and an internationally-administered greater Jerusalem.
It is often asserted that the modern State of Israel was created by
this Resolution as a byproduct of
Although widely accepted as an unassailable truism, this assertion is quite false.
The Mandate for
MANDATE FOR
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of
giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of
Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration
of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire,
within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should
be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on
November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by
the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home
for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done
which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish
communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in
any other country; and
Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection
of the Jewish people with
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have selected His Britannic Majesty
as the Mandatory for
Whereas the mandate in respect of
Whereas His Britannic Majesty has accepted the mandate in respect of
Palestine and undertaken to exercise it on behalf of the League of Nations in
conformity with the following provisions; and
Whereas by the aforementioned Article 22 (paragraph 8), it is provided
that the degree of authority, control or administration to be exercised by the
Mandatory, not having been previously agreed upon by the Members of the League,
shall be explicitly defined by the Council of the League Of Nations;
Confirming the said Mandate, defines its terms as follows:
ARTICLE 1 The Mandatory shall
have full powers of legislation and of administration, save as they may be
limited by the terms of this Mandate.
ARTICLE 2 The Mandatory shall
be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and
economic conditions as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national
home, as laid down in the Preamble, and the development of self-governing
institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all
the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion.
ARTICLE 3 The Mandatory shall,
so far as circumstances permit, encourage local autonomy.
ARTICLE 4 An appropriate Jewish
agency shall be recognized as a public body for the purpose of advising and
cooperating with the Administration of Palestine in such economic, social and
other matters as may affect the establishment of the Jewish national home and
the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, and, subject always to the
control of the Administration, to assist and take part in the development of the
country.
The Zionist organization, so long as its organization and constitution
are, in the opinion of the Mandatory, appropriate, shall be recognized as such
agency. It shall take steps in consultation with His Britannic Majesty's
Government to secure the cooperation of all Jews who are willing to assist in
the establishment of the Jewish national home.
ARTICLE 5 The Mandatory shall
be responsible for seeing that no
ARTICLE 6 The Administration of
Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the
population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under
suitable conditions and shall encourage, in cooperation with the Jewish agency
referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the Land, including State
lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.
ARTICLE 7 The Administration of
. . .
Since the Jewish people’s right to reestablish their nation-state in the
biblical
Furthermore, if genuine European remorse over the Holocaust had really existed in 1947, then the United Nations General Assembly would never have issued its niggardly Palestine Partition Plan -- a recommendation of the international community which (following the decades-earlier severing from Mandatory Palestine of all of its lands east of the Jordan River, representing 78% of original Mandatory Palestine, first in 1922, territories which later became the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, being 77% of the Land, and then again in 1923, territories which comprised the Golan Heights, being 1% of the Land) left the Jewish people with less than 11% of that which the League of Nations had originally allocated to them under the Mandate for Palestine and deprived them of any sovereignty over Jerusalem. Rather -- especially in light of the uncompromising language of Article 5 of the Mandate for Palestine -- a penitent U.N., acting through its Security Council, would have issued at that time an authoritative resolution under Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter (which, unlike Chapter VI of the U.N. Charter, authorizes coercive enforcement measures): (1) affirming the continuing primacy of the Mandate for Palestine, (2) recognizing full Jewish sovereignty over the entire western portion of Mandatory Palestine, including Jerusalem, constituting the remaining 22% of original Mandatory Palestine and (3) acknowledging that the Jewish people had a right to repatriate to their countries of origin the many hundreds of thousands of Arabs who, from 1920 onward, had been permitted by Great Britain, as Mandatory trustee, to inundate the western portion of Mandatory Palestine in rank violation of its fiduciary obligations to the Jewish people under the Mandate for Palestine.
Clearly, Israel exists neither due to Europe's alleged guilty conscience nor due to the issuance of the meager Palestine Partition Plan, but due only to the fact that the renascent Jewish State militarily defeated the six Arab states which, together with local “Palestinian” Arab militias drawn from villages, towns and cities throughout the western portion of Mandatory Palestine, had sought to annihilate it from the face of the Earth, thereby igniting Israel's War of Independence.
Those who assert that
Conversely, had the Jewish population centers of the western portion of
Mandatory Palestine been destroyed by the Arabs, and had
Clearly, there is an enormous difference between endorsement and creation. While the United Nations certainly endorsed
the establishment of modern
Nonetheless, that endorsement did bestow upon
However, delving deeper into the realm of Cause and Effect, it may be
cogently argued that the State of Israel presently exists in the biblical
Now, let us hypothetically assume that neither the Arabs residing within the proposed “Palestinian” Jewish state, nor the Arabs residing within the proposed “Palestinian” Arab state, nor the Arabs residing within the surrounding Arab states had ever initiated a war of annihilation against the Jewish population centers of the western portion of Mandatory Palestine, but that they had instead simply acquiesced to the creation of Israel within the Partition Plan lines recommended by U.N. General Assembly Resolution no. 181.
In these circumstances, a democratic
Also in these circumstances, an Israel which was never invaded by the Arabs of the proposed “Palestinian” Arab state and those of the surrounding Arab states would not have fought any War of Independence, and consequently would not have expanded from its 1947 Partition Plan lines to its 1949 armistice demarcation lines -- let alone to its present post-1967 defensible borders.
Consequently, it is likely that such an
That the belligerent and impatient Arabs are themselves principally
responsible for the State of Israel’s present entrenchment in the biblical Land
of Israel as a Jewish nation-state within defensible borders is not only ironic
but -- more importantly -- also constitutes a grand historic replay of the
circumstances under which the Jewish people’s forebears, under the leadership
of Joshua, originally conquered the Land.
As is related in the Hebrew Bible: “Joshua waged war with all of these
[Canaanite] kings for a long time. There was not a city that made peace with
the Children of Israel except for the Hivvite inhabitants of
In sum, modern
© Mark Rosenblit